{"slug":"fuji-street-awards-review","title":"富士街头摄影大赛，哗众取宠还是天神下凡？详细解读与点评来了！","author":"Thomas看看世界","date":"2022-01-23","wechat":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzI4NDA5MzE5NQ==&mid=2247494492&idx=1&sn=456d60b6860b66ba3a93da174b664120&chksm=eb821538dcf59c2e0a1a070573ad37e2453e937c9975b9019fc83650d478e080f287c98ab17e&scene=21#wechat_redirect","blocks":[{"t":"h","x":"Thomas看看世界","xe":"Thomas Chu Photo"},{"t":"p","x":"最近富士街头摄影大赛火了，从50万投稿作品中选出的大奖引发激烈争论。","b":false,"xe":"The Fujifilm Street Photography Awards have recently gone viral, and the grand prize selected from 500,000 entries has sparked heated debate."},{"t":"img","f":"img-02","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"p","x":"一方认为大奖是哗众取宠，这种完全是瞎拍废片，另一方认为大奖是天神下凡，大众审美太垃圾了。","b":false,"xe":"One camp believes the grand prize is grandstanding — nothing but sloppy, worthless shots. The other camp believes the winner is a divine masterstroke, and that public taste is just too poor."},{"t":"img","f":"img-03","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"p","x":"今天的视频教程是一个个人的详细解读分析，包括这组作品有哪些看点和优秀的地方，这组作品又有什么重大缺陷，让我感觉获得大奖充满争议。","b":false,"xe":"Today's video tutorial is a personal, detailed analysis — including what highlights and strengths this winning set has, and what major flaws it has that make me feel the award is highly controversial."},{"t":"p","x":"以及对双方观点的评论和思考。","b":false,"xe":"As well as my commentary and thoughts on both sides' viewpoints."},{"t":"img","f":"img-04","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"h","x":"视频教程","xe":"Video tutorial"},{"t":"bili","bv":"BV1Xq4y1c77S","bpic":"bili-1","bt":"富士街头摄影大赛，哗众取宠还是天神下凡？专业解读与点评来了！"},{"t":"p","x":"这一篇是上面视频的图文整理。富士街头霸王挑战赛从 50 万投稿里评出的头奖《Who am I》引发了两极争论：一派说「垃圾我也能拍」，一派说「大众审美还有很长的路要走」。Thomas 用 25 分钟做了逐层分析——组照好在哪、缺陷在哪、为什么评委选它、以及「小众审美是否就高级」——下面按视频结构整理成图文，获奖作品原图见本文 PPT 部分。","xe":"This is the illustrated companion to the video above. The Fuji Street Photography Challenge's grand prize, 'Who am I', chosen from 500,000 entries, split the internet: one camp sneered 'trash, I could shoot that', the other scoffed 'public taste has far to go'. Thomas spends 25 minutes dissecting it — where the series excels, where it falls short, why the jury picked it, and whether niche taste outranks popular taste. The full award images live in the slides section above.","b":false},{"t":"p","x":"先看本期的问题意识与结论：这是分析不是站队——Thomas 的立场是「有趣、有优点，但缺陷较大，拿头奖持保留意见」（视频 0:22 处标题卡）。","xe":"First, the question and the conclusion: this is analysis, not tribalism — Thomas finds the work interesting and accomplished yet clearly flawed, and reserves doubt about the grand prize (the title card at 0:22 in the video).","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v01","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"h","x":"01 风波与立场","xe":"01 The Storm and a Stance"},{"t":"p","x":"争论分两边：A 方认为「什么垃圾，瞎拍的吧，我拍我也行，废片直接删掉」；B 方认为「大众审美还有很长的路要走」「大众就是低级审美」（视频 1:08 处观点卡）。Thomas 的态度有三条前提：每个人都有创作和评论的自由；可以对作品与获奖事实进行评论；反对上纲上线与人身攻击（视频 3:28 处免责声明卡）。","xe":"The debate split in two: camp A jeered 'garbage, random snapshots, I could do it — I'd have deleted them'; camp B sneered 'public taste has a long way to go; the masses are just lowbrow' (the viewpoints card at 1:08 in the video). Thomas sets three ground rules: everyone is free to create and to comment; the work and the award decision itself are fair game; and personal attacks are off the table (the disclaimer card at 3:28).","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v02","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"img","f":"v03","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"h","x":"02 组照解读：组与单张","xe":"02 Reading the Series: Groups and Singles"},{"t":"p","x":"整组看，五组各有线索：第一组蓝黄对比色、第二组红橙色调、第三组人与狗的生命力、第四组最抽象、第五组以「水果」为线索——从拿着西瓜和刀的人，到被售卖的水果、被吃了一半的苹果（视频 5:30 处）。单张也有不少亮眼处：互补色的色块、如五线谱与音符般的重复节奏、条纹包与条纹衫的呼应、把复杂空间拍成平面结构的功力，以及电梯镜面里层层嵌套的空间（视频 6:16 处）。","xe":"Read as a whole, five threads emerge: a blue-yellow pair, a red-orange set, a vital group of people and dogs, the most abstract cluster, and a 'fruit' thread running from a figure with a watermelon and knife to fruit for sale and a half-eaten apple (at 5:30 in the video). Singles shine too: complementary color blocks, repetition like musical staves and notes, striped bags echoing striped shirts, complex space flattened into plane structure, and elevators mirroring space within space (at 6:16).","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v04","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"img","f":"v05","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"p","x":"特别值得学的一点是他对「普通人状态」的关注：时髦的小姐姐睡眼惺忪地赶去上班、下班者一脸疲惫——街头摄影不必只追逐决定性瞬间或环卫工、建筑工这类「易引起关注」的题材，平淡的日常状态同样值得记录（视频 8:30 处）。Thomas 的总评是：视觉趣味优秀、排版编辑巧妙、个别照片有力量、结构复杂——「有点意思，但又没有特别大的意思」；而评委那句「陌生于美」说得太简单，马格南摄影师「现实与虚拟和谐共生」也偏水（视频 13:32 处作品阐述）。","xe":"One lesson stands out: attention to ordinary people's states — a fashionable young woman squinting her way to work, an exhausted commuter after a shift. Street photography need not chase decisive moments or the usual 'worthy' subjects like sanitation and construction workers; plain everyday states deserve the frame too (at 8:30 in the video). Thomas's verdict: excellent visual wit, clever sequencing, a few forceful frames, complex structure — 'interesting, but not that interesting'; the jury's 'defamiliarizing beauty' says too little, and the Magnum photographer's 'reality and virtuality in harmony' is thin (the artist statement at 13:32).","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v06","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"h","x":"03 大师对照：差距在哪","xe":"03 Against the Masters: Where the Gap Shows"},{"t":"p","x":"放到摄影史里对照，差距立刻直观：罗伯特·弗兰克是这套「反精致」美学的开创者，厉害在思潮的开拓性（视频 14:09 处）；马丁·帕尔同样白天对人直闪，但闪光灯服务于他犀利的批判与荒诞，创作深度完全不同（视频 14:38 处）；布鲁斯·吉尔登的凑脸直闪更是这一路的天花板——不是不能这么拍，而是只学到手法、没学到深度（视频 14:44 处）。","xe":"Set against photo history the gap is immediate: Robert Frank pioneered this anti-polish aesthetic, his greatness lying in opening the movement itself (at 14:09 in the video); Martin Parr also fires flash at strangers by day, but the flash serves his biting satire and absurdism — a wholly different creative depth (at 14:38); and Bruce Gilden's in-your-face flash remains the ceiling of the genre (at 14:44). Borrowing the technique without the depth is the shortfall.","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v07","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"img","f":"v08","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"img","f":"v09","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"h","x":"04 为什么是它获奖","xe":"04 Why This Series Won"},{"t":"p","x":"为什么 50 万选一选了它？第一，作品本身质量确实不错；第二，也是关键——评委风格偏好：把其中一位评委的 Instagram 拉出来看，风格与这组作品高度相似（视频 18:14 处）。所以它被选中，恰恰不是因为它风格多么罕见，而是因为这是评委最熟悉的风格。至于场外原因，越大的比赛越少，但终究无法证实也无法证伪，是罗生门（视频 17:53 处）。投稿启示：想获奖，先研究比赛的评委阵容与往届获奖风格。","xe":"Why did this series win from 500,000? First, the work is genuinely decent; second — the key — jury taste: pull up one judge's Instagram and the stylistic kinship is unmistakable (at 18:14 in the video). It was chosen not because its style is rare, but because it is the style the jury knows best. As for off-stage factors, the bigger the contest the fewer — yet they can be neither proved nor disproved: Rashomon (at 17:53). The takeaway for entrants: study the jury roster and past winners before you submit.","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v10","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"h","x":"05 小众审美更高级吗","xe":"05 Is Niche Taste Really Higher?"},{"t":"p","x":"这是 Thomas 最想反驳的观点：苦的食物一定比甜的高级？悲剧一定比喜剧高级？模仿森山大道就比模仿布列松高级？摄影史不是一条直线，而是一座座山头——画意摄影的山头站满了人，后来者只能另立山头；森山大道是新山头的峰顶，郎静山是画意摄影的峰顶，山头之间并不天然分高下（视频 18:50 处）。错误的评判标准是风格、题材、师承某某、名人肯定、大众喜好；可行的标准是原创性、完成度、拍摄难度、创作深度、呈现高度、摄影圈与社会影响力——一杯苦的速溶咖啡，并不比一杯精心冲泡的龙井高级。","xe":"Here is the claim Thomas most wants to rebut: is bitter food automatically nobler than sweet? Tragedy than comedy? Imitating Daido Moriyama than imitating Cartier-Bresson? Photo history is not a straight line but a range of hills: pictorialism's summit filled up, so newcomers had to found new peaks — Moriyama crowns one, Lang Jingshan another, and no hill is inherently higher (at 18:50 in the video). Style, subject, lineage, celebrity endorsement and mass appeal are the wrong yardsticks; the workable ones are originality, completeness, difficulty, depth, presentational height, and influence within photography and society at large — a cup of bitter instant coffee is not nobler than a carefully brewed Longjing.","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v11","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"h","x":"06 三点思考","xe":"06 Three Closing Thoughts"},{"t":"p","x":"视频落在三段话上：其一，学习大师不只模仿视觉风格，更要学其精神思想、以及与时代艺术思潮的互动，再结合自身实际去创作（视频 23:32 处总结卡）；其二，以开放心态看待各种风格，看不懂可以点评，但既不要人身攻击，也不要唯我独尊；其三，摄影终究是自己的事——90% 完成度的布列松，就是比 20% 完成度的森山大道牛逼，创作自己真正热爱的题材，才是正途。","xe":"The video lands on three thoughts: first, learn from the masters' spirit and their dialogue with their era — not just their look — then create from your own reality (the closing card at 23:32); second, meet unfamiliar styles with an open mind — you may critique, but neither attack the person nor crown yourself; third, photography is ultimately your own affair — a Cartier-Bresson at 90 percent beats a Moriyama at 20, and creating what you truly love is the way forward.","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v12","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"img","f":"v13","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"quote","x":"1. 评判作品看原创性、完成度、拍摄难度、创作深度、呈现高度与影响力，而不是风格站队——90% 完成度的布列松胜过 20% 的森山大道；2. 作品获奖往往与评委风格偏好相关：不是风格罕见才中奖，而是评委最熟悉才中奖；3. 这组头奖值得学的是对平凡视角的关注、视觉趣味与组照编辑，局限是手法有余而创作深度不足；4. 摄影终究是自己的事：以开放心态看世界，以自己的热爱定方向。","xe":"1. Judge work by originality, completeness, difficulty, depth, presentational height and influence — not by stylistic camps: a Cartier-Bresson at 90 percent beats a Moriyama at 20; 2. Awards track jury taste: it is rarely rarity that wins, but familiarity; 3. The grand prize teaches attention to ordinary perspectives, visual wit and series editing, while its limits lie in technique outpacing depth; 4. Photography is finally your own affair — see the world with an open mind and set your course by what you love.","b":false},{"t":"h","x":"高清视频：","xe":"HD video:"},{"t":"p","x":"https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Xq4y1c77S/","b":false,"xe":"https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1Xq4y1c77S/"},{"t":"h","x":"PPT","xe":"PPT"},{"t":"img","f":"img-05","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-06","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-07","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-08","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-09","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-10","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-11","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-12","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-13","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-14","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-15","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-16","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-17","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-18","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-19","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-20","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-21","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-22","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-23","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-24","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-25","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-26","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-27","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-28","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-29","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-30","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-31","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-32","w":1080,"h":608},{"t":"img","f":"img-33","w":1080,"h":608}],"titleEn":"Fujifilm Street Photography Awards: Grandstanding or Divine? A Detailed Analysis and Review Is Here!"}