{"slug":"skypixel-2021-review","title":"无人机照片如何拍？航拍摄影大赛获奖作品分析解读来啦~","author":"Thomas看看世界","date":"2021-07-18","wechat":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzI4NDA5MzE5NQ==&mid=2247493569&idx=1&sn=5621da5472a9cbaca7044369dff54d59&chksm=eb8219a5dcf590b33bc3f7fa95ba583318b7e7feb478448246579182113764781510484450dd&scene=21#wechat_redirect","blocks":[{"t":"h","x":"Thomas看看世界","xe":"Thomas Chu Photo"},{"t":"p","x":"优秀的摄影作品，不仅有个性，也有很多共性。","b":false,"xe":"Excellent photography works have not only individuality, but also many commonalities."},{"t":"p","x":"通过关注摄影大赛，是一种很好的开拓摄影思路，紧跟行业趋势的方式。","b":false,"xe":"Following photography contests is a great way to broaden your photography thinking and keep up with industry trends."},{"t":"p","x":"在本周的教程中，Thomas就会和大家分享和解读航拍类的顶级赛事 - 大疆天空之城摄影大赛今年的获奖作品。","b":false,"xe":"In this week's tutorial, Thomas will share and interpret the winning works of the top aerial photography event - DJI SkyPixel Photo Contest this year."},{"t":"h","x":"视频教程","xe":"Video tutorial"},{"t":"bili","bv":"BV1mV411H7Nf","bpic":"bili-1","bt":"航拍照片如何拍？天空之城大赛评委带你寻找常见思路！"},{"t":"p","x":"这一篇是上面视频的图文整理。不少观众说看不懂比赛获奖作品，所以这期托马斯除了点评 2021 年大疆天空之城六周年航拍大赛的获奖结果，还首次披露了评委视角：一场航拍比赛到底怎么评、评委能看到什么、好作品又赢在哪里。文章保留了视频里的关键截图，配合文字方便对照。","xe":"This is the illustrated companion to the video above. Because many viewers said they could not understand contest winners, Thomas not only reviews the results of the 2021 DJI SkyPixel 6th Anniversary aerial contest but also reveals the judge's perspective for the first time: how an aerial contest is actually judged, what judges get to see, and where winning images gain their edge. Key screenshots from the video are preserved throughout for easy reference.","b":false},{"t":"p","x":"先看总览。下面这张要点页截自视频 2:11 处，是托马斯总结的单张航拍作品五个加分项：陌生感、创意与拍摄难度、形式画面感、瞬间性、航拍独特视角——下文逐一展开。","xe":"Start with the overview: this summary slide, captured at 2:11 in the video, lists the five qualities that elevate a single aerial photograph — novelty, creativity and shooting difficulty, formal visual impact, the decisive moment, and a distinctly aerial perspective. Each is unpacked below.","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v01","w":768,"h":480},{"t":"h","x":"01 先懂比赛：评委如何评奖","xe":"01 Understand the Contest: How Judges Decide"},{"t":"p","x":"看比赛结果之前要先懂比赛。不同比赛有不同的调性和偏好：有的偏向旅游生活方式，有的看重极致的构图与视觉效果，有的希望作品里有观念、有见解。结果还会受评委和工作人员偏好的影响——历史悠久的比赛有长期稳定的调性，而手机相机厂商办的新比赛，则极大受到每一届评委自身风格的影响（视频 0:43-1:16 处）。","xe":"Before reading any results, understand the contest itself. Different contests have different tonality and preferences: some lean toward travel and lifestyle, some prize bold composition and visual impact, and some want ideas and a point of view in the work. Results are also shaped by the tastes of judges and staff — long-running contests carry a stable tonality, while newer contests run by phone or camera manufacturers are heavily influenced by each year's judging panel (at 0:43-1:16 in the video).","b":false},{"t":"p","x":"为什么工作人员也有影响？因为大赛投稿动辄数以万计，受邀的终审评委看到的，已经是第一轮筛过、每个类别剩下四五十幅的作品；第一轮的筛选，做的正是厂商或杂志的编辑和工作人员。所以别急着问「为什么我的作品没获奖」——很可能评委根本没见到过它，它在前一关就被筛掉了（视频 1:16-1:48 处）。","xe":"Why does the staff matter? Because major contests receive tens of thousands of entries. The invited final-round judges only see what survives the first cut — roughly forty to fifty works per category — and that first cut is made by the brand's or magazine's editors and staff. So don't rush to ask \"why didn't my photo win\" — chances are the judges never even saw it (at 1:16-1:48 in the video).","b":false},{"t":"p","x":"当然，优秀作品终归有共性。一等奖和大奖作品是多位评委讨论出来的结果，多少都有可取之处；我们可以去总结这些规律和流行的创作方式，给自己的拍摄一些启发（视频 1:51-2:09 处）。","xe":"That said, strong works do share common traits. First-prize and grand-prize images are the product of discussion among multiple judges and always carry real merit; we can summarize those patterns and popular approaches and let them inform our own shooting (at 1:51-2:09 in the video).","b":false},{"t":"h","x":"02 单张航拍的五个加分项","xe":"02 Five Qualities That Elevate a Single Aerial Frame"},{"t":"p","x":"第一条，也是所有单张作品的共同标准：陌生感。在每天数以亿计张图片被生产出来的时代，如果你的画面是大家见过的场景、见过的拍法，观众早就司空见惯，评委也很难提起兴趣（视频 2:22-2:47 处）。至于怎么营造陌生感，后面结合具体获奖作品来分析。","xe":"First — and the shared standard for all single-frame work — is novelty. In an era when billions of images are produced every day, if your picture shows a scene people have seen and a technique they know, the audience is long numb to it and judges struggle to care (at 2:22-2:47 in the video). How to create that novelty is unpacked below through the actual winners.","b":false},{"t":"p","x":"第二是创意与拍摄难度：好的创意、别人到不了的地方、极难完成的角度，当然会加分。第三是形式画面感——单张作品好比文字里的诗词，本身的韵律和节奏极其重要。第四是瞬间性：很多获奖作品都融入了转瞬即逝的元素，它同时带来陌生感和不可复制性。第五是航拍的独特视角：如果你虽然是无人机拍的，但看起来像站在高塔上或地面角度拍的，那就不太符合航拍比赛的初衷了（视频 2:48-3:43 处）。","xe":"Second is creativity and shooting difficulty: a fresh idea, a place few can reach, an angle that is brutally hard to pull off — all of it earns points. Third is formal visual impact: a single frame is like a poem among written forms, where rhythm and cadence matter enormously. Fourth is the decisive moment: many winners fold in a fleeting element, which brings both novelty and unreplicability. Fifth is a distinctly aerial perspective — if your drone shot looks like it was taken from a tower or from the ground, it misses the point of an aerial contest (at 2:48-3:43 in the video).","b":false},{"t":"h","x":"03 大奖与一等奖：陌生感与形式美","xe":"03 Grand and First Prizes: Novelty and Formal Beauty"},{"t":"p","x":"今年的年度大奖是金鱼跃出水面的一瞬（视频 3:50 处）。金鱼落水的题材并不新鲜，以前看到的多是站在船上用相机抓拍落水的一瞬；但这是第一次有人从空中、以垂直九十度向下的经典航拍视角去看它——足够陌生，也足够精彩。","xe":"This year's grand prize captures the instant a goldfish leaps out of the water (at 3:50 in the video). The subject itself is hardly new — most previous versions were shot from a boat with a camera, catching the moment of splashdown. But this is the first time someone has looked straight down at it from the air, in the classic ninety-degree aerial perspective — unfamiliar and brilliant at once.","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v02","w":768,"h":480},{"t":"p","x":"这张照片几乎集齐了前面说的所有加分项：它带着强烈的瞬间性，而无人机的连拍并不好用——按一下要等一下，不像相机可以无限连拍，稍慢一点就错过精彩场景，所以拍摄难度很高（视频 4:22-4:39 处）；构图上，鱼落水的一瞬采用居中构图，极具形式美感；溅起的水花被打亮，又充满力量感和生命的张力。作为大奖作品，评审们毫无异议（视频 4:41-5:05 处）。","xe":"This frame collects nearly every quality listed above: a fierce decisive moment, captured against real difficulty — drone burst shooting is clumsy, one press at a time with a pause in between, unlike a camera's unlimited burst, so a fraction of a second's delay loses the scene (at 4:22-4:39 in the video). Compositionally, the splashdown uses a centered framing of great formal beauty, and the lit spray radiates power and the tension of life. As a grand-prize work, it was unanimous (at 4:41-5:05 in the video).","b":false},{"t":"p","x":"再看一等奖作品的共性（视频 5:13-5:47 处）。航拍其实不必去拍非常复杂的场景——获奖作品反而多是简洁的画面：几个大色块、冷色与暖色的对比、红白蓝三色的几何构成。飞得越高，细节越看不见，航拍最擅长的恰恰是制造这种抽象的几何感。","xe":"Next, what the first prizes share (at 5:13-5:47 in the video). Aerial work does not require wildly complex scenes — the winners are mostly simple frames: a few large color fields, warm-cool contrast, geometric compositions in red, white and blue. The higher you fly, the less detail matters; what aerial photography does best is precisely this abstract geometry.","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v03","w":768,"h":480},{"t":"p","x":"另一批一等奖作品里都有「点睛之笔」——人。无论是船还是坐着的人，一方面增加故事感，另一方面提供尺度感（视频 5:58-6:14 处）。比如 6:18 处这张《KingSize》：没有中间那个小小的人影，你只会以为拍的是一段普通的台阶；有了他，你才意识到这是一座如印度阶梯井般庞大的建筑——人也瞬间成为画面的焦点。","xe":"Another group of first prizes all carry a finishing touch — a human figure. Whether a boat or a seated person, it adds narrative on one hand and a sense of scale on the other (at 5:58-6:14 in the video). Take \"KingSize\" at 6:18: without the tiny figure in the middle you would see nothing but an ordinary flight of steps; with him, you realize it is a structure as vast as an Indian stepwell — and the person instantly becomes the focal point.","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v04","w":768,"h":480},{"t":"p","x":"当然，这一批作品也有可挑剔之处。比如 7:04 处这张红桥：横构图其实比竖构图更好看，竖构图留白和多余的空间太多。再比如 7:16 处那张非常震撼的云海，后期清晰度加得有点猛，黑色区域显得有些脏——但整体而言，陌生感、冲击力、构图美感与抓到的瞬间都在线，作为一等奖没有问题（视频 6:57-7:33 处）。","xe":"That said, this batch is not beyond critique. The red bridge at 7:04, for instance, works better in a horizontal crop — the vertical one leaves too much empty, redundant space. And the stunning sea of clouds at 7:16 has had clarity pushed too hard in post, leaving the black areas slightly dirty. Overall, though, the novelty, impact, compositional beauty and captured moments all hold up — worthy first prizes (at 6:57-7:33 in the video).","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v05","w":768,"h":480},{"t":"img","f":"v06","w":768,"h":480},{"t":"h","x":"04 二三等奖：亮点与遗憾","xe":"04 Second and Third Prizes: Highlights and Flaws"},{"t":"p","x":"二等奖和三等奖的作品都有可取之处，但也各有缺陷（视频 7:35 处）。比如 7:42 处这张，画面稍显单调，但两条鱼一黑一白、黑白双煞的布局就是它的吸睛之笔。而 7:52 处这种用影子代替主体的拍法——滑雪的、驼队的都有——前几届天空之城已经出现过多幅类似获奖作品，如今已经被拍得比较滥了；同样的照片放前几届名次会更高，这一届就只能往后排了。","xe":"Second- and third-prize works all have merit, but each carries a flaw too (at 7:35 in the video). The frame at 7:42, for example, is a bit plain, yet its eye-catcher is the pair of fish — one black, one white — arranged like two contrasting spirits. And the shadow-as-subject approach at 7:52 — skiers, camel caravans and the like — already produced several winners in earlier SkyPixel editions and has become rather overdone; the same photo would have ranked higher in past years, but now it slips down the list.","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v07","w":768,"h":480},{"t":"img","f":"v08","w":768,"h":480},{"t":"p","x":"8:16 处那组记录当地人收获的作品是个遗憾：喜悦的情绪、航拍视角下密集的收获产物与人物同框，其实非常震撼，如果不受单张赛制的限制，它甚至有冲击大奖的可能（视频 8:16-8:43 处）。类似地，9:05 处那张表现人与生存环境的照片，单张的说服力偏弱，用组图去展现会更有力量，也许更适合去参加别的比赛。","xe":"The series at 8:16 documenting a local harvest is a pity: the joy, and the sheer visual shock of dense harvest produce framed against tiny figures from the air, is genuinely stunning — freed from the single-frame format it might even have contended for the grand prize (at 8:16-8:43 in the video). Similarly, the photo at 9:05 about people and their living environment is less convincing as a single frame; as a series it would carry far more force, and might do better in other contests.","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v09","w":768,"h":480},{"t":"p","x":"裁切与取舍同样决定名次。8:51 处这张海岸作品，沙地留得太多，把船逼到了角落；如果只取一小块，着重表现水的纹理和白色的纹理，画面会震撼得多（视频 8:46-9:01 处）。10:19 处的足球场也是同一个道理：为了取下整个球场，反而不如只取画面的一角——让密密麻麻铺满画面的人、每个人不同的物件、床单的形态和睡姿成为主角，会更有趣也更震撼。有的图片大局更有意思，有的图片细节更有意思，这张的细节明显胜过全局（视频 10:19-11:05 处）。","xe":"Cropping and selection decide rankings just as much. The coastline frame at 8:51 keeps too much sand, crowding the boats into a corner; cropping to a small section that emphasizes the textures of water and white sand would be far more striking (at 8:46-9:01 in the video). The football field at 10:19 makes the same point: squeezing the entire pitch into frame works worse than taking one corner — letting the densely packed people, their personal belongings, the shapes of their sheets and their sleeping postures become the subject would be more interesting and more powerful. Some images win on the big picture, some on detail; here detail clearly beats the whole (at 10:19-11:05 in the video).","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v10","w":768,"h":480},{"t":"img","f":"v11","w":768,"h":480},{"t":"p","x":"三等奖里还有几张值得细品。9:36 处云雾之上的楼阁颇为仙气，但这类画面大家看得比较多，名次自然上不去；9:44 处行走于荷叶之间的作品，光线塑造略显刻意、有点像后期制造的光效，绿色也透着一点人造感，看着不够舒服（视频 9:22-9:58 处）。10:04 处的滑雪倒是拍摄难度极高——在雪山上飞无人机抓拍这样的场景并不容易，拿奖没问题，只是美感、瞬间与创意相较前奖稍逊。","xe":"A few third prizes reward a closer look. The pavilion above the clouds at 9:36 is ethereal, but such scenes have become familiar, so it could not rank higher; the work at 9:44 of a figure walking among lotus leaves shows lighting that feels a touch contrived — like a manufactured glow from post — and the green carries a slightly artificial cast (at 9:22-9:58 in the video). The ski shot at 10:04 was genuinely hard to make — flying a drone over snowy mountains to catch that scene is no easy feat — so its prize is deserved, even if its beauty, moment and idea fall a little short of the winners above it.","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v12","w":768,"h":480},{"t":"img","f":"v13","w":768,"h":480},{"t":"p","x":"最后用 10:30 处这张足球场收尾正合适：它提醒我们，看照片、拍照片都要想清楚「到底什么有意思」。以上就是对天空之城六周年航拍大赛的全部点评——这些只是托马斯的主观感受，不一定对，欢迎在评论区聊聊你的看法（视频 11:11-11:26 处）。","xe":"The football field at 10:30 makes a fitting closing note: it reminds us that both looking at and making photographs demand clarity about what is actually interesting. That concludes this review of the SkyPixel 6th Anniversary aerial contest — these are Thomas's subjective takes, not gospel, so share your own reading in the comments (at 11:11-11:26 in the video).","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v14","w":768,"h":480},{"t":"quote","x":"1. 看比赛先看调性：不同比赛偏好不同，投稿要选对主场，也要理解评委与工作人员初筛的现实；2. 单张航拍五个加分项：陌生感、创意与拍摄难度、形式画面感、瞬间性、独特航拍视角；3. 获奖共性可复用：简洁的几何色块、冷暖明暗对比、点睛之笔的人物；4. 题材会过时，剪裁见功力——同一拍法晚几届名次必降，横竖构图、整体与局部的取舍决定成败。","xe":"1. Read a contest's tonality first: every contest prefers different things — pick the right arena for your work and respect the reality of staff pre-screening; 2. Five qualities elevate a single aerial frame: novelty, creativity and difficulty, formal beauty, the decisive moment, and a truly aerial perspective; 3. The winners' habits are reusable: clean geometric color fields, warm-cool and light-dark contrast, and a human figure as the finishing touch; 4. Subjects age while cropping reveals mastery — the same approach ranks lower a few editions later, and choices like horizontal vs vertical, whole vs detail decide the outcome."},{"t":"h","x":"高清视频：","xe":"HD video:"},{"t":"p","x":"https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1mV411H7Nf/","b":false,"xe":"https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1mV411H7Nf/"},{"t":"h","x":"获奖作品欣赏","xe":"Winning Works Appreciation"},{"t":"img","f":"img-02","w":1080,"h":1439},{"t":"p","x":"年度摄影大奖","b":false,"xe":"Photography Grand Prize of the Year"},{"t":"p","x":"摄影 Karim Iliya","b":false,"xe":"Photo: Karim Iliya"},{"t":"img","f":"img-03","w":1080,"h":1915},{"t":"p","x":"一等奖","b":false,"xe":"First Prize"},{"t":"p","x":"Andrii Chuiashenko","b":false,"xe":"Andrii Chuiashenko"},{"t":"img","f":"img-04","w":1080,"h":1350},{"t":"p","x":"一等奖","b":false,"xe":"First Prize"},{"t":"p","x":"Grzegorz Tatar","b":false,"xe":"Grzegorz Tatar"},{"t":"img","f":"img-05","w":1080,"h":730},{"t":"p","x":"一等奖","b":false,"xe":"First Prize"},{"t":"p","x":"习小远的视界","b":false,"xe":"Xi Xiaoyuan's Vision (习小远的视界)"},{"t":"img","f":"img-06","w":1080,"h":719},{"t":"p","x":"一等奖","b":false,"xe":"First Prize"},{"t":"p","x":"Ilanna Emily","b":false,"xe":"Ilanna Emily"},{"t":"img","f":"img-07","w":1080,"h":809},{"t":"p","x":"一等奖","b":false,"xe":"First Prize"},{"t":"p","x":"Joao Galamba","b":false,"xe":"Joao Galamba"},{"t":"img","f":"img-08","w":1080,"h":1620},{"t":"p","x":"二等奖","b":false,"xe":"Second Prize"},{"t":"p","x":"陈靖文","b":false,"xe":"Chen Jingwen (陈靖文)"},{"t":"img","f":"img-09","w":1080,"h":1650},{"t":"p","x":"二等奖","b":false,"xe":"Second Prize"},{"t":"p","x":"Prithvi B","b":false,"xe":"Prithvi B"},{"t":"img","f":"img-10","w":1080,"h":720},{"t":"p","x":"二等奖","b":false,"xe":"Second Prize"},{"t":"p","x":"Rafid007","b":false,"xe":"Rafid007"},{"t":"img","f":"img-11","w":1080,"h":864},{"t":"p","x":"二等奖","b":false,"xe":"Second Prize"},{"t":"p","x":"amdadhossain","b":false,"xe":"amdadhossain"},{"t":"img","f":"img-12","w":1080,"h":719},{"t":"p","x":"二等奖","b":false,"xe":"Second Prize"},{"t":"p","x":"Ido meirovich","b":false,"xe":"Ido meirovich"},{"t":"img","f":"img-13","w":1080,"h":1620},{"t":"p","x":"三等奖","b":false,"xe":"Third Prize"},{"t":"p","x":"静言","b":false,"xe":"Jing Yan (静言)"},{"t":"img","f":"img-14","w":1080,"h":1621},{"t":"p","x":"三等奖","b":false,"xe":"Third Prize"},{"t":"p","x":"Adrei Puhach","b":false,"xe":"Adrei Puhach"},{"t":"img","f":"img-15","w":1080,"h":1080},{"t":"p","x":"三等奖","b":false,"xe":"Third Prize"},{"t":"p","x":"Hugo Healy","b":false,"xe":"Hugo Healy"},{"t":"img","f":"img-16","w":1080,"h":1351},{"t":"p","x":"三等奖","b":false,"xe":"Third Prize"},{"t":"p","x":"Luca Cornago","b":false,"xe":"Luca Cornago"},{"t":"img","f":"img-17","w":1080,"h":570},{"t":"p","x":"三等奖","b":false,"xe":"Third Prize"},{"t":"p","x":"mehmetaslan","b":false,"xe":"mehmetaslan"},{"t":"p","x":"相关推荐：","b":false,"xe":"Related recommendations:"},{"t":"p","x":"《这些照片为什么能拿到2018国家地理摄影大奖？》","b":false,"xe":"\"Why Did These Photos Win the 2018 National Geographic Photography Awards?\""},{"t":"p","x":"《国际摄影奖2019奖项公布，这些获奖作品都太棒了吧！》","b":false,"xe":"\"International Photography Awards 2019 Winners Announced — These Winning Works Are All Amazing!\""},{"t":"p","x":"《视觉盛宴，2018年最好看的101张自然风光照片》","b":false,"xe":"\"A Visual Feast: The 101 Most Beautiful Nature Landscape Photos of 2018\""},{"t":"p","x":"《这些风景照片也太震撼了！颜值超高的2019自然风光摄影比赛获奖作品欣赏》","b":false,"xe":"\"These Landscape Photos Are So Stunning! Appreciating the Gorgeous 2019 Nature Landscape Photography Contest Winning Works\""},{"t":"p","x":"《手机也能出大片？看看这些万里挑一的照片都是怎么拍的吧（华为新影像2019）》","b":false,"xe":"\"Can Phones Produce Masterpieces Too? See How These One-in-Ten-Thousand Photos Were Shot (HUAWEI Next Image 2019)\""},{"t":"p","x":"《这些全景接片也太壮观了吧!2019 Pano Awards》","b":false,"xe":"\"These Panoramic Stitches Are So Spectacular! 2019 Pano Awards\""},{"t":"p","x":"《2020年IPA摄影奖公布，这些获奖作品都太强了吧！》","b":false,"xe":"\"2020 IPA Photography Awards Announced — These Winning Works Are All So Powerful!\""},{"t":"p","x":"《全景照片怎么拍才好看？2020年最具视觉冲击力的全景照片都在这里啦！》","b":false,"xe":"\"How to Shoot Panoramic Photos That Look Great? The Most Visually Impactful Panoramic Photos of 2020 Are All Here!\""},{"t":"p","x":"《2020年最好看的风光照片，这个比赛的获奖作品太震撼了！》","b":false,"xe":"\"The Most Beautiful Landscape Photos of 2020 — This Contest's Winning Works Are Too Stunning!\""},{"t":"h","x":"欢迎关注@Thomas看看世界","xe":"Follow @Thomas Chu Photo,"},{"t":"h","x":"每周学会一个摄影技能","xe":"Learn one photography skill every week."}],"titleEn":"How to Shoot Drone Photos? Analysis and Interpretation of Aerial Photography Contest Winning Works Is Here~"}