{"slug":"world-press-photo-2024-review","title":"特朗普遇刺神作竟落选？世界新闻摄影比赛获奖照片解读！","author":"Thomas看看世界","date":"2025-04-20","wechat":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzI4NDA5MzE5NQ==&mid=2247501802&idx=1&sn=8436019f374ee5f935e06e87bcaf5beb&scene=21#wechat_redirect","blocks":[{"t":"p","x":"去年Evan Vucci拍摄的特朗普遇刺现场照片，因为决定性瞬间的抓拍和简洁具有冲击力的构图，被网友们奉为新闻摄影的神作。","b":false,"xe":"Last year, Evan Vucci's photo of the Trump assassination attempt, with its decisive-moment capture and clean yet powerful composition, was hailed by netizens as a masterpiece of photojournalism."},{"t":"p","x":"没想到刚刚公布结果的2024年世界新闻摄影比赛，这幅神作却没有获奖，获奖的是现场另一位摄影师拍摄的照片。","b":false,"xe":"Unexpectedly, in the just-announced 2024 World Press Photo Contest, this masterpiece did not win. The award went to a photo taken at the same scene by another photographer."},{"t":"img","f":"img-01","w":1080,"h":1439},{"t":"p","x":"Thomas今天就会对此进行解读，并比较两张照片的各自优劣。","b":false,"xe":"Today Thomas will explain this and compare the respective strengths of the two photos."},{"t":"h","x":"视频","xe":"Video"},{"t":"bili","bv":"BV1kV5bzTEC4","bpic":"bili-1","bt":"特朗普遇刺神作竟落选？世界新闻摄影比赛获奖照片解读！"},{"t":"p","x":"这一篇是上面视频的图文整理。2025 年世界新闻摄影比赛（荷赛）结果公布后，最大的话题不是大奖花落谁家，而是去年刷屏的 Evan Vucci 特朗普遇刺「神照」落选，获奖的是现场另一位摄影师——《华盛顿邮报》的 Jabin Botsford。Thomas 在视频中对比了两张照片的优劣，本文整理了他的完整分析。","xe":"This article is the illustrated companion to the video above: after the 2025 World Press Photo results were announced, the biggest talking point was not who won, but that Evan Vucci's viral Trump assassination photo lost — and the winning frame came from another photographer on the scene, Jabin Botsford of The Washington Post. This is Thomas's full comparison of the two images.","b":false},{"t":"p","x":"先说结论（视频 0:38 处）：两张照片都是好照片。Evan Vucci 的那张无疑更具传播性，而获奖照片更具文献性；左边非常好看，右边更加耐看——左边视觉冲击力强、简洁，右边在内容上更有深度和层次，对事件的观点更全面、更丰富、也更客观一丢丢。","xe":"The conclusion first (at 0:38): both are good photos. Evan Vucci's frame is unquestionably the more viral one, while the winning photo has more documentary value; the left is better looking, the right more rewarding to look at — the left hits hard and clean, the right runs deeper, more layered, with a fuller, richer and slightly more objective view of the event.","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v03","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"h","x":"01 决定性瞬间与英雄叙事","xe":"01 The Decisive Moment and the Hero Narrative"},{"t":"p","x":"先分析 Evan Vucci 的照片（视频 1:38 处）：特朗普握紧双拳、目光坚毅，是一个标准的决定性瞬间；摄影师采用仰拍——仰拍会让人物显得高大，俯拍则相反，平视才是更客观的视角；配合振臂高呼的动作和背后的美国国旗，周边环境又比较干净，整个画面真有一种「英雄归来」的气势，视觉冲击力非常强。","xe":"Start with Evan Vucci's photo (at 1:38): Trump's clenched fists and hard gaze form a textbook decisive moment; the photographer shot from a low angle — looking up makes the subject tower, looking down shrinks him, and only the level view is objective; paired with the raised fist, the American flag behind and a comparatively clean background, the whole frame feels like a hero's return. Its visual impact is enormous.","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v01","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"p","x":"但如果想让一张照片反映整个事件，这张其实是非常片面的（视频 2:25 处）。看过现场视频就知道：特朗普一开始摸着耳朵不知道发生了什么，随后有些惊慌、被特工死死压住保护，突然又敏锐地站起来振臂高呼、开始带节奏，接着又被特工架下去——被架下去的过程中还有非常丰富的表情变化和内心变化。政客本身就有表演性质，而这张照片拍的正是那个表演性的英雄时刻。","xe":"Yet if one photo is to reflect the whole event, this one is remarkably one-sided (at 2:25). Watch the full footage and you see: Trump first touches his ear not knowing what happened, then panics and is pinned down by agents, suddenly senses the moment and springs up, fist raised, working the crowd — only to be dragged down again, his expressions and inner shifts shifting constantly along the way. Politicians perform by nature, and this photo captures precisely the performed hero moment.","b":false},{"t":"h","x":"02 获奖照片赢在哪里","xe":"02 Where the Winning Photo Wins"},{"t":"p","x":"再看今年荷赛获奖的照片（视频 3:14 处）：特朗普的表情里既有坚毅，又有惊恐和无措——他被旁边的保镖围着、颤巍巍地被架下台阶，这是一个更丰富、更真实的人物状态。信息也更完整：可以看到特朗普、他的保镖，以及背后振臂高呼的支持者们。","xe":"Now the winning photo (at 3:14): Trump's expression carries resolve and fear and bewilderment all at once — hemmed in by bodyguards, wobbling as he is hustled down the steps. It is a richer, truer state of the man. The information is fuller too: Trump, his agents, and behind them the supporters with raised fists are all in the frame.","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v02","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"p","x":"细节尤其值得玩味（视频 3:51 处）：同样是保镖，每个人的动作和神情完全不同；非常符号化的 MAGA 红帽子，是拿在保镖手上，而不是戴在特朗普头上；前景是一水儿西装革履的「统治阶级」，背后则是穿着短袖、牛仔裤的选民——完全不同的两种画风，给照片带来大量解读和发散的空间。加上平视的视角，以及一个非表演性的、真实的时刻，它在细节与可发散的空间上确实更胜一筹。","xe":"The details reward study (at 3:51): the agents, though all bodyguards, move and look completely differently; the iconic red MAGA cap is in an agent's hand, not on Trump's head; the foreground is a wall of suits — the ruling class — while behind them stand voters in T-shirts and jeans, a totally different visual register, opening the photo to endless reading. With a level viewpoint and an unperformed, truthful moment, it simply offers more to unpack.","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v04","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"h","x":"03 好照片的标准不止一个","xe":"03 There Is More Than One Standard for a Good Photo"},{"t":"p","x":"新闻更加讲究相对的客观与全面（视频 4:54 处）。毫无疑问，从新闻摄影、从荷赛的角度来讲，这张照片是更好的那一张；但如果比传播性，现场没有任何一张照片比得上 Evan Vucci 那张经典。比较好坏需要选择相应的坐标系——比传播性，Vucci 赢；比复杂性、内容深度、客观与全面，获奖照片或其他角度的照片更优秀。好照片的标准并不是单一的，而是要看你追求什么。","xe":"Journalism prizes relative objectivity and completeness (at 4:54). From a photojournalism and World Press Photo standpoint, the winning frame is clearly the better one; but on pure virality, nothing from that scene touches Evan Vucci's classic. Comparisons need a coordinate system: on spread, Vucci wins; on complexity, depth, objectivity and completeness, the winning photo — or other angles — do. There is no single standard for a good photo; it depends on what you are chasing.","b":false},{"t":"h","x":"04 你的目的决定你的标准","xe":"04 Your Purpose Sets Your Standard"},{"t":"p","x":"Thomas 也分享了自己的经历（视频 5:44 处）：同一个主题，他编辑了两组照片。用于互联网传播的一组，对真实场景做了修改，加入大量主观的色彩和情绪，更有视觉冲击力、传播性和艺术性；而用于摄影比赛、想真实全面地展现事件的那组，则重新做了编辑。摄影师创作时需要思考：这组照片是想记录真实的时刻、进行自我表达、引起传播，还是获得商业回报——目的决定了评判标准。","xe":"Thomas shares his own experience (at 5:44): for one project he edited two sets of photos. The set for the internet altered the real scene, layering in subjective color and mood — more striking, more shareable, more artistic; the set for competitions, meant to show the event truthfully and completely, was edited differently. When creating, a photographer must ask: is this set meant to record a real moment, to express myself, to go viral, or to earn commercial return — the purpose defines the judging criteria.","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v05","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"img","f":"v06","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"img","f":"v07","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"p","x":"所以回到开头的那两张照片（视频 6:43 处）：一张在传播上是一张绝佳的照片，另一张对世界新闻摄影比赛、对这样的媒体而言，更耐看、更全面、更丰富。两张都是真正好的照片。","xe":"So back to the two photos (at 6:43): one is a superb image for spreading, the other — for World Press Photo and journalism of this kind — is more rewarding, more complete and richer. Both are truly good photographs.","b":false},{"t":"img","f":"v08","w":852,"h":480},{"t":"quote","x":"1. 好照片的标准不是单一的：传播性、文献性、艺术性各有坐标系，先想清楚你在追求什么；2. 仰拍、旗帜与干净的背景可以造就英雄叙事，但也可能让画面偏向单向的宣传化效果；3. 新闻摄影讲究相对的客观与全面——细节的密度与可解读的空间，正是「耐看」的来源；4. 创作之前先明确目的：记录、表达、传播还是商业，它决定你的拍摄与编辑方式。","xe":"1. There is no single standard for a good photo: virality, documentary value and artistry each have their own coordinate system — know what you are chasing first; 2. Low angles, flags and clean backgrounds can build a hero narrative, but may also push the frame toward one-sided propaganda; 3. Photojournalism prizes relative objectivity and completeness — the density of detail and room for interpretation is what makes an image rewarding; 4. Define your purpose before creating — record, express, spread or sell — for it decides how you shoot and edit."}],"titleEn":"The Iconic Trump Assassination Photo Lost? Reviewing the World Press Photo 2024 Winners!"}